![]() |
|
|
#106 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 74
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 | |
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 147
|
I agree. If the WWE tells him to, he becomes the "heel" wrestler and starts waving around the "I'm sXe I'm better" flag. If he really wanted to show serious positivity toward sXe, he wouldn't let that wouldn't happen. It just makes an ass image out of sXers. And if you're one of those people who doesn't routinely watch wrestling but may stay on it a few minutes when channel-flipping, that's not a good representation to stick with you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Doncaster, England
Posts: 29
|
To be fair to the guy, if he actually refused to do a gimmick, then he'd likely either get jobbed out by Vince McMahon or fired. The wrestling business is ruthless, and wrestlers who get there know that it's a rare opportunity and that you go with what you're told to do. I once spoke to a pro wrestler who was having a WWE tryout, and he said that he'd dress in women's clothes and portray a transvestite if that was the gimmick given to him because it's such a good job opportunity to be in the WWE.
In short, Punk made his name using his sXe lifestyle as a gimmick on the indies and obviously it's worked for him after advancing it somewhat in the WWE. Changing the gimmick that has worked for him since he got into the business would be foolish. |
|
|
|
|
|
#110 | |
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 | |
|
.....
|
Quote:
__________________
Others walk the bow, I walk the string
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 74
|
A lot of them change gimmicks all the time - usually when they are stuck in a dead end gimmick that's not advancing their career. Phil Brooks is straight edge in real life and has naturally always used it as his gimmick, ever since he first started in the pro wrestling business. It's worked for him so far. He's even been World Champion. He's drawing lots of ratings and "heat" (he gets a lot of boos as a heel or villain persona), and for the WWE that means dollar signs. So they probably won't be having him change his gimmick anytime soon, for better or worse. It's just going over too well. People love to hate CM Punk right about now.
That's to say nothing of how people might come to view straight edge or people who adhere to the doctrine but aren't militant or cultlike, like the character Phil Brooks is portraying, but the WWE hasn't exactly had a good track record of accommodating groups who complain, especially fringe groups. His current gimmick about forming a stable or a following is just a re hashed version of what the Undertaker did in the late 90's with his Ministry of Darkness, which was a Satanic cult of sorts. The WWE got a lot of backlash both from Christians and neo pagans for those portrayals back in the day, but the gimmick was kept for over a year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 | |
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CM Punk | angelchickjb | Sports | 9 | 08-26-2010 01:07 PM |
| sXe bands that aren't punk (or some form of punk) | Slain | Questions | 3 | 06-20-2008 12:39 PM |
| pop-punk | XuntaintdbloodX | Other | 6 | 08-24-2004 03:55 PM |
| Punk? | sabresnmets | Questions | 65 | 02-02-2004 03:24 AM |